Environmental Journalist Interviews a Global Warming Skeptic

Amanda Little
March 21, 2010

Amanda Little

Environmental Reporter

A reporter on environmental issues including climate change, Amanda Little recently interviewed Sen. James Inhofe, who is prehaps the Senate's most ardent opponent to climate change legislation. Needless to say, it was pretty combative.

Here's a portion:

Q. You reasserted in today's hearing your belief that global warming is a hoax. Can you clarify specifically who is perpetrating the hoax? Who are the dupers and who are the victims of the climate hoax?

A. Who are the victims? It would be the United States. It would be the economy, what would happen to this country according to MIT* and others who have made analyses as to the economic destruction that would come with something like cap-and-trade or [regulating greenhouse-gas emissions] through the Clean Air Act.

Amanda Little: Premiere Motivational Speakers BureauJames  Inhofe: Premiere Motivational Speakers Bureau

Q. Who are the perpetrators of the hoax?

A. That's the United Nations and the IPCC, clearly.


Q. Major energy companies have said they believe the scientific consensus on climate change. ExxonMobil said the appropriate debate isn't on whether the climate is changing, but what we should do about it. NASA, NOAA, the Pentagon, the Pope, evangelical leaders, top executives in all industries, and governments all over the world including China and India--they've all acknowledged climate change. Do you believe that all of these entities have been scammed by the U.N. and a handful of scientists in the IPCC?

A. What you've just said is not true. There's not unanimity at all even though you want to believe it.


NOAA and NASA and all these organizations, these people are all tied in to the IPCC. There are a lot of companies, oil companies and all that, who would like to have cap-and-trade. That's where they can make money.


Q. What do you believe is the motive of the U.N.? What is the motive of the scientists who are perpetrating the hoax? How do you think they stand to benefit?


A. They stand to benefit [from] government grants and private sector grants [from places] like the Heinz Foundation.


We have scientists who are really sincere, and they've watched what's going on and they have a hard time believing it. Those are the ones who started going to me probably seven or eight years ago, saying they're cooking the science on this, someone's got to say it, and I said it. And then more of them came. I listed them on my website. I've been very clear all along who the perpetrators were, what the motives were.


Q. So you believe that the U.N. and the scientists on the IPCC are perpetrating the hoax in order to get grant money?


A. No, no, no. We've already covered this, Amanda. You guys always ask the same question over and over again looking for a different answer. What is it you want that I didn't already tell you?


Q. I'm trying to clarify the motivation behind the hoax. Why would these scientists want to deceive the global public?


A. It's very clear that when you have the U.N. behind it, and you have all the Hollywood people moving in, you have the Heinz Foundation, that's John Kerry's wife -- a lot of very wealthy people.


Many of [the scientists] know that if they were recipients of grants in the past, that could well be cut off. Or if they haven't had them, they would want them. The complaints I had brought to me were from scientists who said that many scientists had been intimidated into saying things that weren't true because of that leverage that has been used.


Q. So you believe the scientists and the U.N. are in it for the money?


A. Well, that enters into it, yes.

Read the entire interview at AmandaLittle.com.

Amanda Little is booked for speaking events exclusively by Premiere Speakers Bureau. For information on how to bring her to discuss environmental issues at your next event, complete the "Check Availability" form at PremiereSpeakers.com/Amanda_Little.

Amanda Little

Want Amanda Little for your next event?

Find out more information, including fees and availability.
Find Out More
Keep Reading
Making Every Oil Calorie Count
Amanda Little
Amanda Little
March 10, 2011
The following was written by environmental reporter and author of "Power Trip," Amanda Little, for The New ...
Offshore Oil Drilling: Better Here Than Elsewhere
Amanda Little
Amanda Little
June 04, 2010
The following is an editorial written by environmental journalist Amanda Little in ...
Environmental Journalist Interviews a Global Warming Skeptic
Amanda Little
Amanda Little
March 21, 2010
A reporter on environmental issues including climate change, Amanda Little ...
Making Every Oil Calorie Count
The following was written by environmental reporter and author of "Power Trip," Amanda Little, for The New York Times: AS turmoil in Libya pushes up the price of oil, American consumers are once again feeling the sting of $3.50-a-gallon gasoline. But the impact of costly crude on our lives and economy extends far beyond the pump. Virtually ev...
Read More
Offshore Oil Drilling: Better Here Than Elsewhere
The following is an editorial written by environmental journalist Amanda Little in response to the BP oil leak. One month after BP's Deepwater Horizon rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico and unleashed a catastrophic oil spill, the costs are sickening.Fragile marshes once rich with marine life are now coated with brown scum. Hundreds of shrimpe...
Read More
Environmental Journalist Interviews a Global Warming Skeptic
A reporter on environmental issues including climate change, Amanda Little recently interviewed Sen. James Inhofe, who is prehaps the Senate's most ardent opponent to climate change legislation. Needless to say, it was pretty combative. Here's a portion: Q. You reasserted in today's hearing your belief that global warming is a hoax. Can you c...
Read More